Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Global Britain

11 January 2021 · 58 other contributors

Opened by Elizabeth Truss Con South East Cambridgeshire

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Elizabeth Truss raised concerns about global britain in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Proposes the House considers Global Britain to emphasize free trade and fair play.
  • Highlights the need for radical thinking on economic growth post-COVID-19.
  • Discusses securing trade arrangements with Turkey, Canada, Mexico, and Japan.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Elizabeth Truss Con South East Cambridgeshire

Proposes that the House considers Global Britain, highlighting the importance of free trade and fair play. Emphasises the need to think radically about economic growth post-COVID-19 and use our new global platform to promote free and fair trade. Mentions securing arrangements with Turkey for Ford Dagenham, Canada for beef producers, Mexico for car exporters like Jaguar Land Rover, and Japan for FinTech and computer gaming industries. Also discusses the emerging markets trade scheme to offer better deals to low-income countries.

Other contributors (58)
  • Tobias Ellwood Con Bolton West

    Asks if it is the right time to move from G7 to G10, including Korea, India, and Australia, representing over half of world GDP. Suggests this would help in updating the UN, NATO, and WTO.

  • Christian Wakeford Lab Bury South

    Asks Elizabeth Truss to consider expanding the Abraham accords through Cabinet discussions to promote peace, trade, and aid in the Middle East.

  • Daniel Kawczynski Con Shrewsbury and Atcham

    Emphasises the importance of explaining to the electorate how lower tariffs will benefit third-world countries by enabling them to produce products that cannot be produced in the UK.

  • Emily Thornberry Lab Islington South and Finsbury

    Critiqued the lack of support given to businesses, questioned the decision to remove transport representatives from advisory groups, pointed out that continuity agreements signed with countries like Egypt and Cameroon contain no human rights provisions, suggested that the Government's approach to trade deals is a missed opportunity for strengthening global fight against climate change.

  • Conor Burns Con Newbury

    Defended the decision to delay continuity agreements until after Brexit, arguing that many countries did not think the UK would actually leave and realised only late in the day they needed to sign agreements with the UK.

  • Theresa May Con Brixton

    Echoed the comments made by her right hon. Friend, emphasised that continuity was important for businesses at the point of leaving the EU and that excellent work had been done in securing these agreements.

  • Theresa May Con Maidenhead

    Mrs. May emphasised that global Britain is about more than just trade, including shared values such as human dignity and democracy. She warned against nationalism and isolationism and stressed the importance of working with other nations to uphold these values. Mrs. May criticised the Government for threatening to break international treaties and reducing aid, arguing this undermines the UK's reputation globally. She also highlighted the threat to the unity of the United Kingdom, particularly concerning issues in Northern Ireland.

  • Alyn Smith SNP Na h-Eileanan an Iar

    Mr. Smith expressed scepticism about the Global Britain project and criticised the Trade Secretary for not addressing immediate real-world concerns such as empty shelves caused by Brexit-related issues in Northern Ireland. He highlighted losses like the Erasmus programme, which he called economic vandalism against universities. Mr. Smith also discussed the rejection of musicians' visas and freedom of movement rights, arguing these are essential to soft power and cultural exchange. He proposed independence for Scotland within Europe as an alternative to Global Britain.

  • Thomas Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

    Mr. Tugendhat expressed sympathy with the argument against a border but argued for free trade and the importance of rules-based trading systems. He supported his right hon. Friend's comments on investment in developing countries, and emphasised the need for fair labour practices and data regulations.

  • Jeremy Corbyn Ind Islington North

    Mr. Corbyn criticised the British response to the covid crisis and mentioned the inadequacy of vaccine distribution. He also highlighted issues arising from Britain's departure from the EU, the power of global corporations, human rights abuses in trade deals, and the need for environmental standards.

  • Mr. Ellwood discussed the historical context of 2021 as a year of significant change due to authoritarianism and China's strategic agenda. He emphasised the importance of international organisations, updated rules, climate agreements, and strategies for dealing with China. Mr. Ellwood recommended expanding the G7 group to include Australia, India, and Korea.

  • Sarah Champion Lab Rotherham

    Champion calls for a development policy underpinned by a commitment to poverty reduction and emphasises the critical role of local organisations in advancing women's rights, especially during crises. She also highlights the importance of upholding international rules and human rights, particularly regarding China’s actions in Hong Kong.

  • Andrew Mitchell Con Sutton Coldfield

    Mitchell stresses the need for global Britain to represent values rather than geographical interests alone. He urges the Government not to break its 0.7% promise on aid spending, emphasising the importance of development funding in enabling trade and economic growth. He criticises the timing of proposed budget cuts amidst international leadership roles.

  • Williams critiques the concept of Global Britain as unrealistic and arrogant, arguing it diminishes the UK's future prospects by ignoring present realities. He highlights the Government’s trade deal that raised barriers to trade and criticises the reduction in international aid as well as the withdrawal from Erasmus, emphasising Wales' potential for independent success.

  • Liam Fox Con Wyre Forest

    Welcomed the end of EU membership but stressed that Brexit is not a panacea. Emphasised the need for vision, courage and boldness in policy execution. Highlighted the importance of having more exporters to make free trade agreements worthwhile. Advocated for addressing non-tariff barriers imposed by richer nations on poorer countries' exports. Called for reforming multilateral institutions like the WTO to better suit 21st-century challenges.

  • Geraint Davies Lab Swansea West

    As a Council of Europe trade rapporteur, advocated embedding democracy, rule of law, human rights and environmental sustainability in all UK trade deals. Criticised the lack of scrutiny on post-Brexit trade deals compared to EU standards. Raised concerns over China's dominance in global trade negotiations despite its poor track record on human rights. Emphasised the importance of COP26 for ensuring that future trade agreements are environmentally sustainable and aligned with fundamental values.

  • Conor Burns Con Bournemouth West

    Stressed the reality of global Britain's presence in key international organisations such as the IMF, G7, and UN Security Council. Highlighted Northern Ireland's inclusion under global Britain. Emphasised that trade is not just about prosperity but also a moral mission contributing to the emergence of middle classes globally, leading to demand for rights and freedoms.

  • Ian Paisley Jnr DUP North Antrim

    Called for Northern Ireland's fair share in global Britain's actions. Criticised the Northern Ireland protocol as a 'disaster' impacting internal UK trade, urging immediate action through invoking article 16 to fix issues like customs declarations and import restrictions of PPE. Emphasised seizing opportunities such as leading in hydrogen technology.

  • Rupa Huq Lab Ealing Central and Acton

    Global Britain is undermined by recent decisions like reducing international aid and hard Brexit. The UK's relationship with the EU has worsened, leading to significant economic impacts. Red tape and costs have increased for businesses, while cooperation on defence, environment, and international aid has diminished.

  • Daniel Kawczynski Con Shrewsbury and Atcham

    Supports the three seas initiative as a significant regional bloc in Europe. Advocates for sanctions against companies involved in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to protect NATO partners from Russian energy blackmail, urging the government to follow US actions.

  • Jonathan Edwards PC Carmarthen East and Dinefwr

    Welsh businesses' most important trade relationship remains with the EU. Concerned about potential punitive action by the EU due to standard divergence, and critical of demands for deregulation. Sees Brexit as politically, economically, and culturally damaging, questioning how sovereignty gained will be beneficial.

  • David Morris Con Morecambe and Lunesdale

    The speaker highlighted the positive effects of leaving the EU on his constituency, focusing on trade and business opportunities. He discussed upgrades at Heysham port and its potential for freeport status, energy projects like Hydrogen to Heysham involving EDF Energy and academic institutions, the Eden Project's arrival in Morecambe, and the UK’s ongoing involvement with European Space Agency and OneWeb.

  • Fiona Bruce Con Congleton

    Bruce emphasised the importance of protecting freedom of religion or belief globally. She cited several regions where religious freedoms are under threat and highlighted the Prime Minister’s commitment to this issue, stating her role as special envoy aims to make a positive difference both in projection of global Britain and for individuals worldwide.

  • Ruth Edwards Con Rushcliffe

    Edwards discussed the east midlands region's industrial heritage and its potential under global Britain. She highlighted local businesses, proposed free port schemes at East Midlands airport and surrounding areas, emphasising job creation, investment opportunities, and green energy developments.

  • Layla Moran Lib Dem Oxford West and Abingdon

    Moran criticised the Government's definition of global Britain, arguing it lacks commitment to human rights, social justice, and global equality. She raised concerns about vaccine inequity and aid cuts, questioning how excess vaccines will be used to support lower-income countries.

  • Imran Hussain Lab Bradford East

    Hussain criticises the UK Government's approach towards human rights abuses in Kashmir, accusing it of failing to condemn illegal and arbitrary detentions, rapes, and other grave violations by India. He argues that Britain should not shirk its responsibilities and must use its influence as a permanent UN Security Council member to resolve the Kashmir issue.

  • Fell highlights the UK's role in vaccine development and distribution, committing over £500 million to ensure equitable access to vaccines for developing countries. He also supports the Prime Minister’s announcement of a £3 billion commitment towards climate change solutions that protect and restore nature and biodiversity.

  • Smith speaks about the UK's trade deals with various nations post-Brexit, emphasising its unique position to act as a conduit between Commonwealth countries and Europe. He also advocates for challenging global powers like China on human rights issues such as Hong Kong and Xinjiang.

  • Florence Eshalomi Lab Co-op Vauxhall and Camberwell Green

    Eshalomi argues that 'Global Britain' should reflect the lived reality of diverse communities like Vauxhall, focusing on social and cultural ties rather than just trade deals or hard power projection. She fears a hard Brexit path isolating Britain.

  • Giles Watling Con Clacton

    Watling argues that the UK should build on its global Britain vision, which involves reinvesting in international relationships and championing free trade. He emphasises that standards such as food hygiene, environmental and animal welfare must not be undermined by Brexit or future trade deals. Watling also highlights the importance of levelling up deprived areas like his constituency of Clacton.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Shannon interjects to express optimism about the opportunities presented by Brexit, particularly in engaging with mid-sized democracies such as Australia and South Korea for new trade deals.

  • Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens

    Doogan criticises the post-Brexit trade deal's impact on the fishing industry, noting that Scottish fish exporters face difficulties in getting their products into EU markets due to a dysfunctional system. He also expresses concern over new non-tariff barriers affecting sectors like seed potatoes and regrets the loss of European diversity at educational institutions.

  • Cherilyn Mackrory Con Truro and Falmouth

    Mackrory highlights Cornwall's global economic footprint, showcasing local businesses such as Allen & Heath in audio technology, Tregothnan exporting tea to international markets including China, and Pendennis Shipyard with a presence in Barcelona. She emphasises the role of apprenticeship schemes in training future workers and looks forward to promoting Cornish talent during events like the G7 presidency.

  • Mary Foy Lab City of Durham

    Critiqued the Government’s approach to trade deals, focusing on the impact of industrial strife at Heathrow airport and calling for protection of frontline workers from exploitative practices.

  • John Lamont Con Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk

    Focused on economic opportunities post-covid-19, emphasised the importance of an export-led recovery, highlighted local success stories in textile manufacturing, and called for tailored trade relationships.

  • Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn

    Expressed concerns about human rights protections in new trade treaties, questioned the treatment of Ghana during negotiations, and urged caution and professionalism in international relations to maintain good governance and respect.

  • Called for clarity on the definition of 'global Britain', highlighted contradictions in current signals sent by the UK regarding values and interests, and advocated for a full-throated expression of British justice and liberty.

  • Kim Johnson Lab Liverpool Riverside

    Disagrees with the Government's plan to cut UK aid commitments from 0.7% to 0.5% of gross national income, emphasising that this move is unprincipled and unjustified. Criticises the potential impact on Yemen where millions need humanitarian assistance and protection. Calls for maintaining current aid commitments.

  • Taiwo Owatemi Lab Coventry North West

    Concerned about the scrapping of international programmes such as Erasmus+ and the introduction of a less comprehensive Turing programme, which does not offer reciprocity. Advocates for prioritising Britain's manufacturing industry and preserving its global reputation.

  • Supports Global Britain initiative, emphasising the importance of international engagement and trade agreements. Highlights the UK’s role in developing the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine and advocates for continued global leadership through events like the G7 and COP26.

  • Questions the inclusivity of the phrase 'Global Britain' and expresses concern over potential compromises on standards during trade negotiations. Urges for a focus on democracy, human rights, good governance, peacebuilding, and climate change leadership in international affairs.

  • Siobhain McDonagh Lab Mitcham and Morden

    The measure of success for Global Britain is how it responds to international injustices. The UK should take a strong stance at the UN Human Rights Council meeting in March on Sri Lanka's human rights issues.

  • Harriett Baldwin Con West Worcestershire

    It is shameful to break the manifesto pledge to spend 0.7% of national income on UK aid, as it will harm the world’s poorest. The cut in the aid budget will lead to more babies dying and fewer children finishing school.

  • Global Britain requires involvement from all Government departments, constituencies, and people to succeed. It needs calm diplomacy focused on delivery, strong values, and pragmatic recognition of social justice through a strong economy.

  • Steve McCabe Lab Birmingham Selly Oak

    The country should be outward looking and multilateralist, confronting difficulties rather than retreating from the Middle East. Support for those challenging Iran's regime is needed; we must not tolerate Iran’s warmongering or support for terrorism. A $250 million peace fund created by legislation in US Congress offers an opportunity to build peace in the Middle East with a role for Britain.

  • Andrew Bowie Con West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine

    Britain stands at a critical juncture, facing challenges from Russia and China while upholding values of democracy and free trade. The UK is already leading on foreign aid spending, second highest defence spender in NATO, permanent member of the UN Security Council, and a country that respects democratic referendums. Post-EU Britain has signed 64 trade deals worth over £885 billion and leads efforts against climate change with net zero emissions by 2050 legislation.

  • Claudia Webbe Lab West Ham

    Under the current Government, Britain is world-beating for wrong reasons: highest number of excess deaths in Europe and worst recession. The UK has alienated itself on the global stage by cosying up to Trump and forming a reputation for rhetoric, incompetence, and mismanagement. It's crucial to consider impact of Britain’s colonial legacy on modern-day global insecurity and ensure that countries in the global south are not denied access to vaccines due to financial constraints.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    The UK has secured agreements for £885 billion in trade in one year. The EU deal is a good pragmatic agreement, allowing businesses to better trade worldwide, food producers increased recognition with geographical indicators, farmers better deals free from Brussels bureaucracy. Seize negotiations with New Zealand, Canada, Australia and the US; establish coalitions for free trade and human rights; stand against China's threat to security, economy and health.

  • David Linden Lab Glasgow East

    Critiques the UK Government’s cut to the aid budget, arguing it shows a prioritization of domestic interests over global responsibilities. He emphasises that cutting the aid budget will exacerbate poverty and instability worldwide. Also criticises the withdrawal from Erasmus-plus, highlighting missed opportunities for young people, and expresses concern over the lack of action to replace non-formal aspects of the scheme with the Turing programme. Raises issues regarding ongoing tariffs on Scotch whisky exports and their impact on jobs in the supply chain.

  • Alistair Carmichael LD Orkney and Shetland

    Challenges the narrative around global Britain, suggesting it should be rooted in values such as support for human rights rather than purely transactional trade. Criticises the abolition of the Department for International Development and the decision to no longer spend 0.7% of GNI on overseas aid. Discusses ongoing tariffs on Scotch whisky and their impact on exports.

  • Supports the concept of global Britain, emphasising trade opportunities and economic growth through initiatives like freeports, rail capacity investments, and specialisms in sectors such as space and hydrogen. He also highlights the importance of educational exchange programmes like the Turing scheme and looks forward to COP26 leadership on climate change.

  • Claire Coutinho Con East Surrey

    Argues for Britain's readiness to take advantage of its new freedoms post-Brexit. Emphasises the need to adapt to global economic changes, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region and technological advancements. She highlights UK’s strengths such as economy size, Nobel prizes, universities, and diplomatic roles while advocating for flexible regulations and innovative partnerships to maintain competitive edge.

  • Theo Clarke Con Stafford

    Across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, over 125,000 people have already received the coronavirus vaccine. This is a truly staggering feat, given that this time last year many of us had never even heard of covid-19. The vaccination programme has been made possible by healthcare workers, members of the armed forces and volunteers. However, in less developed countries, responding to this need through existing health systems will be near on impossible, with one doctor for every 30,000 patients in Tanzania and fewer than 20 ICU beds for entire populations in most African countries. Therefore, today, I call for every country to strengthen their preventive measures to fight the immediate crisis and invest in healthcare workers and essential medicines. Britain has a long-standing history of leading in vaccines, being a founding member of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and championing access to vaccines. The UK’s leadership and co-operation are needed to end covid-19.

  • Martin Vickers Con Brigg and Immingham

    Welcoming today’s debate on the future as a sovereign free-trading nation, I am confident about our place in the world. The Government has successfully negotiated over 60 continuity agreements since leaving the EU almost a year ago. We should consider CANZUK to bring Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK together as an international powerhouse. As a trade envoy to the western Balkans, there are considerable opportunities across renewables and infrastructure projects for SMEs in the UK to get involved. The forthcoming COP26 world conference will focus attention on the green agenda and create a massive opportunity for the UK to showcase what our industries offer in global markets. Post Brexit we retain the status of a respected partner with a dynamic economy, one of the greatest military powers in the world, and effective exercisers of soft power.

  • Gareth Thomas Lab Co-op Harrow West

    Welcomes the opportunity to conclude the debate and acknowledges powerful speeches from Labour MPs. Criticises the International Trade Secretary for not mentioning President-elect Biden, neglecting Asian markets and African allies. Highlights that the deal with the European Union is thin gruel as it does not maintain access to EU services markets or ensure certainty in financial services. Points out the new red tape and forms businesses must complete post-Brexit. Expresses disappointment over incomplete rollover agreements and lack of parliamentary scrutiny. Criticises the Government for mishandling negotiations with Ghana, emphasising the need for an apology. Questions future trade deals' impact on human rights and environment. Raises concerns about the UK joining the CPTPP without clear answers to basic questions.

  • Greg Hands Con Hove

    Thanked the Members for their contributions and emphasised that following Brexit, the UK has reached an ambitious agreement with the EU, changing its relationship from EU law to free trade. He highlighted the successful negotiations of 63 countries covering 97% of pre-Brexit trade agreements. He also addressed criticisms from Labour MPs regarding provisional application of trade deals and noted inconsistencies in their past practices. Hands praised speakers for their passion on topics ranging from global trade, manufacturing, human rights, and development.

  • Emily Thornberry Lab/Co-op Islington South and Finsbury

    Critiqued the UK-EU trade agreement and expressed concerns about its provisional application. Emphasised a desire to rejoin the EU based on her interpretation of complex trade agreements.

  • Gareth Thomas Lab Harrow West

    Was criticised for past decisions related to provisional application of deals similar to current issues faced under the new UK-EU trade agreement.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy