Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age)

06 October 2020 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Pauline Latham Con Newcastle-under-Lyme

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Pauline Latham raised concerns about marriage and civil partnership (minimum age) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Moves a Bill to revoke parental or judicial consent for the marriage of children under 18
  • Cites examples of child brides, highlighting physical and emotional harm caused by forced marriages
  • Argues for updating the 1929 law to protect childhood and social aspirations

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Pauline Latham Con Newcastle-under-Lyme

Moves a Bill to revoke parental or judicial consent for the marriage of children under 18 and criminalise such marriages. Cites examples of child brides, highlighting the physical and emotional harm caused by forced marriages. Emphasises that the law allowing marriage with parental consent dates back to 1929 and argues for updating it to protect childhood and social aspirations.

Other contributors (1)
  • Pauline Latham Con Newcastle-under-Lyme

    Proposes a Bill to criminalise child marriages under 18, citing the case of Jasvinder Sanghera who set up Karma Nirvana to help victims of forced marriage. Mentions that by not addressing this issue, the UK is violating international human rights conventions and allowing child sex abuse.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy