Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body

25 June 2020 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Ian Paisley Jnr DUP North Antrim

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Ian Paisley Jnr raised concerns about parliamentary works sponsor body in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns raised during the debate on Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body
  • Specific asks of government were not recorded
  • No commitments were made during the debate

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Other contributors (2)
  • Expresses concern about the mothballing of plans for the decant and refurbishment of Parliament, questioning how the building will be maintained safely without a full programme.

  • Damian Hinds Con East Hampshire

    Acknowledges the risks to the Palace of Westminster from fire, flood, and falling masonry. Stresses that restoration works remain vital while also considering good value for money in current reviews.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy