House of Commons · General Debate
19 May 2020 · 2 other contributors
Opened by Michael Fabricant Con L Oswestry
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Michael Fabricant raised concerns about parliamentary works sponsor body in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
Key points
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
Questions the assessment made by the sponsor body regarding cost reductions in the parliamentary works programme due to the ongoing pandemic, highlighting current spending of several million pounds for essential repairs while questioning the feasibility and necessity of a larger project estimated between £4 billion and £8 billion.
Questions the sponsor body's assessment on cost reductions in parliamentary works programme due to COVID-19, raises concerns about ongoing spending of millions for repairs and fire damage prevention while expressing doubt over a proposed large-scale project.
Acknowledges the impact of COVID-19 on decision-making processes, emphasises the importance of value for money in restoration projects, and states that a broader strategic review will be conducted by the Sponsor Body and Delivery Authority to consider possible trade-offs.
Government Response
Emphasises the importance of value for money in restoration projects, confirms that a broader strategic review will be conducted considering current circumstances, and reassures that any decision regarding the project would follow proper parliamentary procedures.