Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Covid-19: International Response

06 May 2020 · 25 other contributors

Opened by Anne-Marie Trevelyan Con Berwick-upon-Tweed

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Anne-Marie Trevelyan raised concerns about covid-19: international response in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • UK pledged 388 million for vaccines, tests, and treatments to combat the coronavirus pandemic.
  • British scientists are developing diagnostic devices and conducting vaccine trials.
  • UK committed over 2 billion to GAVI, the global vaccine alliance.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Anne-Marie Trevelyan Con Berwick-upon-Tweed

The Secretary of State for International Development outlined that the UK is supporting the global effort to combat the coronavirus pandemic, pledging £388 million for vaccines, tests and treatments. She highlighted the role of British scientists in developing diagnostic devices and working on vaccine trials. The UK has also committed over £2 billion towards GAVI, the global vaccine alliance, and pledged to suspend debt service payments to the poorest countries until the end of 2020. The aim is to prevent further spread of the virus globally while protecting domestic healthcare systems like the NHS.

Other contributors (25)
  • Anne-Marie Trevelyan Con Berwick-upon-Tweed

    The UK has pledged £388 million for vaccines, tests and treatments. British scientists are playing a key role in developing rapid diagnostic devices and working on vaccine trials. The country is also investing over £2 billion towards GAVI to ensure equitable access to vaccines globally. Additionally, the UK is suspending debt service payments to the poorest countries until the end of 2020.

  • Preet Kaur Gill Lab Co-op Birmingham Edgbaston

    Acknowledges the frontline workers and emphasises the importance of a strong DFID. Supports the Secretary of State’s commitment to the pledging event on Monday, contributing £388 million towards coronavirus aid. Questions how much of that funding is new and additional money and inquires about steps taken to secure buy-in from countries not participating, such as the US and China. Criticises comments suggesting competition between nations could benefit vaccine development, urging for cooperation instead. Asks what conditions are attached to public funds going towards research, manufacturing tests, vaccines, and medical tools for coronavirus. Raises concerns over reduced shipments of medical supplies due to cost hikes and airline profiteering, asking about steps being taken to alleviate these issues. Welcomes debt relief efforts but asks how legislative options will protect countries from private debt, stressing the importance of considering food insecurity and other health problems during the pandemic. Warns against diverting resources away from global poverty, inequality, and climate change, advocating for a locally led approach in tackling the pandemic.

  • Acknowledges Preet Kaur Gill's questions. Provides details on funding allocation, mentioning £276 million for resilience and £380 million towards vaccine development through organisations such as CEPI and FIND. Acknowledges UNICEF statistics on reduced vaccine shipments and promises to follow up with officials regarding this issue. Discusses the pledging event co-hosted by various nations including the UK, highlighting ongoing conversations with USAID about commitments from the US. Emphasises that funding is invested in projects with clear contractual relationships ensuring accessibility for vulnerable countries. Stresses the importance of addressing food insecurity and other health issues such as locust plagues. Defends WHO’s role despite criticisms, noting its legitimacy and experience in global health matters.

  • Gagan Mohindra Con South West Hertfordshire

    Asks the Secretary of State about criticisms towards the World Health Organisation and whether these critiques are under review. Inquires if there is a re-evaluation in funding for WHO.

  • Chris Law SNP Dundee Central

    Welcomes measures taken by the UK Government to ensure a multilateral international response but raises concerns about uncontrolled spread of coronavirus in fragile states and refugee camps. Questions if debt repayments for developing countries will be extended beyond 2020 until eradication is confirmed, including private creditors and multilateral institutions in such extensions. Asks how wide-scale vaccination programmes can be rolled out effectively in conflict-ridden areas like Yemen and Syria.

  • Sarah Champion Lab Rotherham

    Welcomed the statement but expressed concern over the impact of the pandemic on the global south, particularly in relation to healthcare. Asked what is being done to support UK NGO organisations and suggested that this could be a time for DFID to develop a global health strategy.

  • Responded by acknowledging the importance of addressing broader healthcare issues beyond just immediate pandemic concerns. Emphasised that DFID was working on refreshing its strategy and considering how to direct aid effectively.

  • David Mundell Con Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale

    Expressed concern about the potential for a 'biblical' famine due to covid-19 and asked if DFID would commit to making nutrition a core part of its response.

  • Confirmed that DFID is committed to preventing and treating malnutrition as part of ending preventable deaths. Stated that the UK remains focused on understanding, tracking, and monitoring the impact of covid-19 on nutrition.

  • Rushanara Ali Lab Bethnal Green and Stepney

    Quoted the UN Secretary-General to highlight the need for an immediate global response to prevent catastrophic outcomes in fragile states. Asked what further action would be taken by the UK Government.

  • Responded that it is essential to appreciate that domestic efforts alone are insufficient and committed to continuing DFID’s programmes and working with multilateral organisations for a coherent and effective response.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Asked how the Department ensures that partner countries abiding by human rights obligations, especially during times of lockdowns and public health measures.

  • Stated that DFID works with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to promote human rights. Highlighted efforts to ensure that the immediate response to covid-19 does not exacerbate conflict but instead builds peace.

  • Kerry McCarthy Lab Bristol East

    Raised concerns about the closure of borders in African countries affecting humanitarian aid and migrants at borders, questioning what is being done to help people in those conditions.

  • Responded by mentioning support through international organisations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and UN agencies to ensure supplies reach refugee camps.

  • Caroline Nokes Con Romsey and Southampton North

    Asked about help being given to Tanzania, where there are accusations of false data regarding the scale of the crisis.

  • Responded that misinformation is a challenge and highlighted the importance of supporting Governments in being honest about their needs to secure help through international organisations.

  • Angela Eagle Lab Wallasey

    Cited ONS figures showing that covid-19 hits the poorest hardest, questioning whether this is a time to defund WHO and asking for support in co-ordinating efforts against the pandemic.

  • Agreed on the importance of understanding vulnerable groups and supported the WHO’s position, stating that the UK remains committed to it.

  • Asked about what is being done in respect of bushmeat and wet markets in China or elsewhere to improve global biosecurity.

  • Responded by emphasising the need for strict food hygiene and health standards, supporting WHO’s position that markets should close if these are not met.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Expressed concern over projects that have lost funding due to non-essential direct debits being stopped. Asked for help in delivering support for such projects.

  • Responded by acknowledging the challenge of fundraising and encouraging innovative methods, referencing Captain Moore’s efforts as an example.

  • Asked what DFID is doing to safeguard and support Fairtrade supply chains during the pandemic.

  • Responded by stating that DFID engages with businesses in UK and developing countries to understand challenges they face. Repurposes programmes to address food insecurity, focusing on the poorest.

Government Response

Responded to Preet Kaur Gill, Gagan Mohindra, and Chris Law. Provided details on funding allocation, acknowledged concerns over vaccine shipment reductions, defended the WHO's role despite criticisms, and outlined steps being taken towards debt relief for developing countries. Responded comprehensively to each question raised by various MPs, addressing concerns related to health strategies, nutrition, human rights, supply chains for aid and Fairtrade goods.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy