House of Commons · General Debate
22 April 2020 · 5 other contributors
Opened by Valerie Vaz Lab Walsall and Bloxwich
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Valerie Vaz raised concerns about consequential amendments in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
Key points
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
We have reached a significant milestone with the House becoming a virtual Parliament, the first of its kind. The motion allows for hybrid scrutiny proceedings that enable the Government to advance their legislative agenda while providing Members an opportunity to scrutinise actions such as the exportation of personal protective equipment and the shortfall in testing capacity.
The Procedure Committee is pleased with the progress made but calls for more inclusive debate time for Opposition days, Back-Bench business days, and other categories of business. It also seeks an urgent debate on lockdown regulations and raises concerns about insufficient scrutiny.
Supports the importance of direct engagement with Ministers for Members to address constituents' issues effectively, suggesting that more Ministers should be available at the Dispatch Box for questions.
Emphasises the need for a general debate on the Government's response to the covid-19 crisis to provide Members with time to raise important points and seek responses from Ministers.
Thanks the Leader of the House for bringing forward the motion, highlights technical difficulties faced by some Members and expresses concern over cancer patients awaiting treatment due to the pandemic's focus on covid-19. Seeks assurances from Ministers regarding patient safety.
Acknowledges the importance of Backbench Business and Opposition days, mentions the possibility of adding these sessions depending on technological capacity. Suggests alternative forms of scrutiny such as daily calls with Members to raise issues directly.
Government Response
Backbench Business and Opposition days are important, but depend on technological capacity. Daily calls with Members by the Paymaster General provide an alternative form of scrutiny and have been well-received.