Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Estimates, Vote on Account 2020-21

02 March 2020 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Patrick Grady SNP 21:30:00

Parliamentary Procedure

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Patrick Grady raised concerns about estimates, vote on account 2020-21 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns were raised about the lack of debate on several billion pounds of public expenditure
  • A highlight was made on the need for increased scrutiny in the estimates process
  • The suggestion was made for the new Chair and Procedure Committee to prioritize scrutiny

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Patrick Grady SNP 21:30:00

Expressed disappointment that the approval of several billion pounds of public expenditure was not subject to any debate. He recognised that it is nobody’s fault, but highlighted a lack of scrutiny in the estimates process and suggested this should be prioritised by the new Chair and Procedure Committee.

Other contributors (2)
  • Patrick Grady 21:30:00

    Noted that despite passing several billion pounds of public expenditure, there was no debate on motions. He pointed out that the Backbench Business Committee and Liaison Committee were not appointed in time to allow topics to be decided for debates.

  • Lindsay Hoyle Speaker Chorley

    Acknowledged Patrick Grady's point of order, stating that it was recorded on the record. He ordered that a Bill would be brought in upon the foregoing Resolutions by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and other officials.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy