Elgin Marbles

Opened the debate

Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to debate a subject that has long been of historical interest but has taken on new significance in the current political climate. The Elgin Marbles are one of the British Museum’s most notorious artefacts. In the early 1800s, Thomas Bruce, the seventh Earl of Elgin, gained access to the temple of the Parthenon and other buildings that comprise the Acropolis in Athens, removing many items of significant cultural interest. The legality of these actions remains disputed due to allegations of bribery or dubious permission. Despite this, the British Government purchased them in 1816. The legal position on their retention has been established by the British Museum Act 1963 and subsequent amendments, but there is scope for amendment to cover specific repatriation cases. Margaret Ferrier argues that returning these marbles would be a moral obligation, align with public opinion (37% in favour of return vs 23% against), and symbolise a shift away from the colonial mindset.

Government Response

Thank you, Ms Ferrier for raising this important topic. In the UK, museums are independent of government and manage their collections as they see fit, adhering to legal obligations. The British Museum Act 1963 prevents national museums from removing objects unless exceptions apply. There have been instances where objects were returned based on claims or ethical considerations. Despite these precedents, the Government respects the museum’s decision regarding the Elgin Marbles. They are legally acquired and housed in a context that allows millions to view them annually for free. The British Museum has engaged in numerous collaborations with Greek institutions, including loans and exhibitions. The Minister reiterated that the Parthenon sculptures remain the legal responsibility of the British Museum, and there is no intention to discuss their return during EU trade negotiations.