Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

European Union (Withdrawal) Acts

08 January 2020 · 2 other contributors

Opened by James Duddridge Con Chesham and Amersham

Brexit

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

James Duddridge raised concerns about european union (withdrawal) acts in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Moves the motion for approval of the Secretary of State's report and statement under sections 2(1) and 13(4) of respective Acts
  • Emphasises that the Government have no plans to change the terms of the withdrawal agreement regarding exit on 31 January
  • Concerns raised but specific asks of government and commitments made by the government are not recorded

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

James Duddridge Con Chesham and Amersham

Moves the motion for approval of the Secretary of State’s report and statement under sections 2(1) and 13(4) of respective Acts. Emphasises that the Government have no plans to change the terms of the withdrawal agreement regarding exit on 31 January.

Other contributors (2)
  • Paul Blomfield Lab Sheffield Central

    Acknowledges the cross-party efforts in securing scrutiny of Brexit proposals. Criticises the Government's refusal to accept amendments that would have preserved parliamentary oversight over future negotiations with the EU.

  • Patrick Grady SNP Glasgow North West

    Reflects on the importance of cross-party efforts in ensuring scrutiny of Brexit proposals. Pays tribute to former colleagues who worked towards securing parliamentary sovereignty. Criticises the Government's approach as a power grab and warns against triumphalism.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy