House of Commons · General Debate
02 November 2016 · 1 other contributor
Opened by Andrew Rosindell Reform Romford
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Andrew Rosindell raised concerns about british victims of terrorism (asset-freezing and compensation) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
Proposes a Bill to provide the UK Government with direct power to freeze or seize assets of any state or organisation that sponsors or perpetrates acts of terrorism, enabling compensation for British victims. Emphasises cases like IRA terrorism sponsored by Colonel Gaddafi's regime and recent threats from new generations of terrorists. Advocates for justice for all victims, highlighting personal examples such as the assassination of Ian Gow and the Canary Wharf bombing.
Calls for action to address the long-standing issue of compensation for British victims of terrorism, particularly those affected by IRA-Gaddafi regime. Highlights discrepancies in compensation received by American and British victims, and urges the UK Government to utilise frozen assets as leverage for negotiations with future Libyan governments. Seeks a legal framework ensuring that any future victims of terrorism receive justice.