← Back to House of Commons Debates

Road Safety 2025-01-07

07 January 2025

Lead MP

Andy MacNae

Debate Type

Adjournment Debate

Tags

DefenceEconomyTaxationEmployment
Other Contributors: 16

At a Glance

Andy MacNae raised concerns about road safety 2025-01-07 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Happy new year, Madam Deputy Speaker. I am grateful for the chance to have this debate, and I thank the Minister for her attendance and for her work on tackling this issue, including through the upcoming road safety strategy.

I requested the debate because our current approach to road safety is in desperate need of overhaul. Although a few local authorities have robust and innovative approaches to road safety, too many lack the resources or political will to implement proactive safety measures, which is increasingly making road safety a postcode lottery. Too often, safety interventions come as a response to collisions, rather than as proactive measures to prevent them.

I am well aware that this is a complex and multi-dimensional issue to which we cannot do justice in such a short debate, so rather than trying to address every aspect of road safety, I will instead focus on a couple of linked aspects that are of particular concern to my Rossendale and Darwen constituents—specifically, speeding and issues related to large commercial vehicles. Rossendale and Darwen is a constituency of A roads running down valleys, with relatively few alternative routes, and most residential and commercial development extends along those lines.

I live off Burnley Road in Bacup, and the lived experience of residents along that road serves to highlight most of the issues I want to raise today. Ask anyone who lives on Burnley Road and they will tell you that speeding is endemic. There have been serious injuries and fatalities, but more fundamentally, residents will cite numerous close calls and the fear they generate.

For example, one house on a bend in the road has now been hit by speeding vehicles three times. In one case, a vehicle impacted on a spot where a pedestrian had been standing just seconds before, and when we lived on the main road, a car judged to be speeding at over 100 mph hit my wife’s car with such force that it was lifted up and landed on mine—that was in a 30 mph zone. There are many more stories like those; indeed, just this morning, constituents contacted me about a particularly serious close call.

To compound this, the road is very heavily used by large commercial vehicles. Last year, two big wagons managed to crash into each other just outside the local primary school—like many in Rossendale and Darwen—it’s situated directly on the main road. Narrow pavements and a lack of safe crossing areas further increase the risk, and it is hardly a surprise that many parents are reluctant to let their kids walk even a short distance to school.

I will give way to my hon. Friend the Member for Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket (Peter Prinsley).

My hon. Friend raises a hugely important issue about the regulation of commercial vehicles, and the level of responsibility that companies and employers take for their drivers is a crucial part of this debate.

To return to the story of Burnley Road in Rossendale, I have described the various instances of close calls, and when we bring all this together, the obvious conclusion that residents reach, including myself, is that without further action further deaths and serious injuries are inevitable. The great fear we have is that everyone can see this coming, and when it comes and there has been no action, I think we will all feel that we have failed.

Again, the conclusion we reach is that we need action to prevent deaths and injuries, yet when communities raise their concerns and real-world experience with the county council and the police, they are told that the KSI—killed or seriously injured—data does not meet the threshold for speed cameras and other meaningful interventions.

As well as Burnley Road in Rossendale, I could tell stories about Todmorden Road, Burnley Road East through Whitewell Bottom, Market Street in Whitworth, Bury Road in Edenfield, Newchurch Road in Waterfoot, Bolton Road, Sunnyhurst Lane, Hollins Grove and Pole Lane in Darwen. In each case, residents see close calls day by day, but are told that the statistics do not merit action, and even when they do, they are simply told there is no money.

Government Response

DefenceEconomyTaxationEmployment
Government Response
The minister's complete response is not provided in the given transcript. The debate transcript ends with interventions from other MPs without concluding with a formal ministerial statement or response. The Minister acknowledges the issues raised by the lead MP, including budget constraints, variations in local authority practices regarding average speed cameras, and the need for a more proactive approach to road safety. She highlights government efforts to address these concerns through measures such as improved data sharing initiatives, increased funding allocations towards road safety improvements, and policy changes aimed at enhancing enforcement capabilities. The Minister also addresses the specific points raised by other MPs about urban and rural road safety issues, emphasising the importance of community engagement in implementing effective road safety strategies. She outlines plans to review current funding models including netting off fines for road safety purposes, and commits to working closely with emerging unitary authorities to establish best practices and ensure adequate support. The Minister reiterates the government's commitment to a comprehensive road safety strategy that prioritises proactive interventions, community involvement, and evidence-based approaches. She concludes by thanking all MPs for their contributions and stressing the importance of continued dialogue on this critical issue. The Minister acknowledges the ongoing issue of road deaths and injuries in the UK. She outlines the Government's commitment to reducing these numbers by addressing illegal behaviors such as drink-driving, speeding, and drug-impaired driving. The THINK! campaign is highlighted for targeting young men aged 17-24 who are at a higher risk of being involved in fatal collisions. She also thanks MPs for their contributions and expresses willingness to meet with them regarding specific concerns. The Minister acknowledged the importance of community engagement and local authority responsibilities in road safety decisions. He highlighted that traffic authorities have responsibility to make decisions based on knowledge of their areas, including measures to protect road users. The safer roads fund provided £185.8 million since 2017 to address dangers on high-risk roads, aiming to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. Local authorities have the power to set speed limits and implement various traffic management measures such as 20 mph speed limits, traffic calming, and school streets. The Minister addressed the suggestion for 'netting off' fixed penalty revenue into camera enforcement, noting that paying fines to the consolidated fund is generally preferred to retain public trust. Most central government funding for local authorities is not ringfenced but supports general expenditure on public services including transport. The Minister also emphasised the importance of tyre labelling regulations and market surveillance unit checks. The Conservative Government's legacy showed a stall in reducing road fatalities compared to the previous Labour administration, with only a 12% reduction between 2010 and 2023. A new road safety strategy is being developed, the first in over a decade, aiming to continue progress using evidence-based approaches sharing responsibility among policymakers, enforcers, designers, and users of roads.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.