← Back to House of Commons Debates
Southport Attack 2025-01-21
21 January 2025
Lead MP
The Secretary of State for the Home Department Yvette Cooper
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
Justice & CourtsEconomy
Other Contributors: 30
At a Glance
The Secretary of State for the Home Department Yvette Cooper raised concerns about southport attack 2025-01-21 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Justice & CourtsEconomy
Government Statement
Today I am making a statement on the Southport murders, where three young girls were killed by Axel Rudakubana. Multiple agencies had contact with Rudakubana but failed to identify the danger he posed. He was referred to Prevent three times between December 2019 and April 2021, and police responded to five calls regarding his behaviour from October 2019 to May 2022. Despite this, agencies did not act on the risks, resulting in a threefold increase in under-18s investigated for terrorism involvement over three years. I am setting up an independent public inquiry to examine what went wrong and consider wider challenges of rising youth violence and extremism. The Government are contacting technology companies to remove dangerous material accessed by Rudakubana online. We will also publish detailed findings from a Prevent learning review following sentencing, appoint Lord David Anderson KC as interim Prevent commissioner, conduct an end-to-end review of Prevent thresholds, and bring in stronger measures against knife sales online. Additionally, the independent reviewer on terrorism powers is examining legislation to ensure it copes with modern threats.
Chris Philp
Con
Croydon South
Question
I thank the Home Secretary for advance sight of her statement and for the briefing she kindly arranged.
Patrick Hurley
Lab
Southport
Question
Will the Home Secretary agree that the public inquiry should be allowed to undertake its work and make recommendations free of political nonsense and lies?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend has been an important voice for his community throughout this difficult time, speaking with dignity and passion. He is right that nothing speculative or misleading should undermine justice, and families need answers about what went wrong and how to prevent future tragedies.
Florence Eshalomi
Lab/Co-op
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Question
What measures will the Home Secretary take to ensure that institutions do not fail in future, given the nature of violence children are viewing online?
Minister reply
Social media companies need to take responsibility for harmful content. The Online Safety Act 2023 will introduce stronger codes and requirements, but we also need these companies to act responsibly instead of going backwards.
Karen Bradley
Con
Staffordshire Moorlands
Question
What reassurance can the Home Secretary give that this inquiry is a cross-Government piece of work and all agencies will be involved?
Minister reply
We need to look at what went wrong in this case, focusing on interactions between different agencies. A statutory child safeguarding practice review and coroner’s inquiry are necessary but insufficient; we require a cross-agency examination.
Bill Esterson
Lab
Sefton Central
Question
Does the Home Secretary agree that nothing in this place should prejudice criminal proceedings or prevent justice from being secured?
Minister reply
People need to see justice. The information is put before the trial and released after the trial, which ensures justice for victims.
David Davis
Con
Goole and Pocklington
Question
Why was this case not declared a terrorist incident initially when there were clear warning signs?
Minister reply
The decision about applying the Terrorism Act 2000 is for the police and CPS. This needs to be reviewed, as highlighted by the Prime Minister.
Shaun Davies
Lab
Telford
Question
What more can the Government do together with intelligence services to hold social media companies accountable?
Minister reply
We are raising issues around dangerous material and online knife sales. Commander Stephen Clayman is reviewing online knife sales, leading to new measures based on that review.
James Cleverly
Con
Braintree
Question
Is it time to get rid of the distinction between terrorism based on ideology and non-ideological violence?
Minister reply
We need to look at risks and actions, not just ideology. The review will focus on this issue.
Chris Murray
Lab
Edinburgh East and Musselburgh
Question
In her statement and the Prime Minister's speech, they painted a terrifying picture of how terrorism is changing in this country and how the threat we face is evolving. Will the Home Secretary tell us how the intelligence services will be responding to this evolving threat?
Minister reply
The focus of the intelligence and security agencies is on those cases where there is organised ideology and radicalisation, as well as state threats, but we have to deal with the kinds of threats that our society faces much more widely. The Online Safety Act will bring in stronger powers for enforcement against technology companies profiting from dangerous material.
Stephen Gethins
SNP
Arbroath and Broughty Ferry
Question
What areas is the Home Secretary looking at on enforcement? What interaction has she had with the Scottish Government in the devolved Administrations?
Minister reply
We are discussing some of our shared responsibilities later this week, but policing and crime are devolved, while national security issues, where terrorism cases may fall or have an impact, are reserved. On such cases, we would expect to consult the Scottish Government.
Paula Barker
Lab
Liverpool Wavertree
Question
Will the Government engage with Survivors Against Terror on its calls for a survivors’ charter, which would extend rights to survivors and the families of victims?
Minister reply
We have regular discussions with survivors of terror. They raise serious concerns about the way in which survivors of the Manchester Arena attack felt let down, and we will continue to discuss the support needed.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
Assuming that someone so committed to fanaticism would not respond to Prevent, what measures are in place to keep such terrible events from happening?
Minister reply
The Government is determined to bring in a new power, a youth diversion order, to address difficult cases involving teenagers and see what requirements might be put on young people.
Paul Waugh
Lab/Co-op
Rochdale
Question
Can the Home Secretary confirm that the inquiry into Southport will look into exactly that danger promoted by such websites?
Minister reply
We will ensure that the issue is clearly in the scope of the inquiry, considering why young people are drawn into an obsession with violence and extremist activity.
Lee Anderson
Reform
Ashfield
Question
How many of those people referred to Prevent over concerns relating to school massacres last year are currently in detention?
Minister reply
A referral to Prevent can be for young people who may have expressed an interest in school massacre, but the point is early intervention to prevent them from committing crimes. We need stronger powers like the youth diversion order.
Mike Tapp
Lab
Dover and Deal
Question
Will the Home Office look into how our legal frameworks might be updated to recognise the full horror of acts intended to terrorise?
Minister reply
We need the legal framework to ensure sufficient scope, powers and sentencing are in place. The accused has been charged under the Terrorism Act 605 and will be treated as a terrorist offender.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
Question
Why was crucial information about the Prevent referral not provided until the trial in the attack on Sir David Amess?
Minister reply
The Government is going further in providing information after the trial than was provided in that case. No one should excuse people who committed crimes by saying it was something to do with the information they were provided.
Gregor Poynton
Lab
Livingston
Question
What more should social media and search engine giants be doing to prevent our young people from accessing violent content?
Minister reply
Social media companies have sophisticated technology and resources. They know exactly how to target individuals online, but they should use those capabilities responsibly instead of reducing moderation.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
Constituents across Lagan Valley send their thoughts and prayers to the families of Elsie, Alice and Bebe. How will a lack of ideology be captured so that we can identify potential perpetrators? What laws can we pass in this House not only to stop social media companies profiting but also ensure they are aware of violent and terrorist content?
Minister reply
The issue is complex with some young people becoming radicalised around an ideology early on, others obsessed with violence, while still others may switch between different extreme ideas. Online safety measures will be enhanced through the Online Safety Act to address such content.
Yvette Cooper
Lab
Keighley
Question
(Shadow Secretary's response was part of the minister's statement and not a separate Q&A)
Josh Simons
Lab
Makerfield
Question
I welcome the uncompromising inquiry announced by the Home Secretary. How does she feel about making decisions in real time to secure our online information environment?
Minister reply
The Online Safety Act will provide new structures and systems, allowing for further action if necessary, prioritising children's safety.
Nick Timothy
Con
West Suffolk
Question
Prime Minister’s denial in August that Rudakubana was being investigated did not protect the trial. If a jury knew facts before the trial, why could the Prime Minister not have told the country the truth?
Minister reply
Investigation and prosecution decisions are made independently by police and prosecutors based on evidence gathered.
Connor Naismith
Lab
Crewe and Nantwich
Question
The murderer was 17 at the time of attack with a history of violence. Should we not ensure teenagers cannot buy knives in the future?
Minister reply
Through the policing and crime Bill, action will be taken to ensure executives of online companies take responsibility for checks that need to occur.
Shockat Adam
Ind
Leicester South
Question
Despite multiple referrals, we failed Elsie, Alice, and Bebe. Does the Home Secretary agree with Shawcross recommendations on ideology obsession?
Minister reply
The Prevent learning review identified that focus on ideology may have missed vulnerabilities to radicalisation.
Ben Spencer
Con
Runnymede and Weybridge
Question
How come so many agencies were aware of the issue but failed in managing perpetrator’s risk?
Minister reply
The inquiry will look into why responsible agencies ultimately failed to identify the scale of risk and take necessary action.
Richard Tice
Reform
Boston and Skegness
Question
Does the Home Secretary agree we need a way to overcome conflict between information release for justice and prejudicing trials?
Minister reply
The Law Commission is reviewing the Contempt of Court Act, ensuring justice is done while providing necessary information.
Luke Evans
Con
Hinckley and Bosworth
Question
Will she consider conducting a review to standardize Government’s approach in talking about these issues?
Minister reply
Focus will be on getting families the answers they need, not excusing those who threw rocks and bricks at police.
Jim Allister
TUV
North Antrim
Question
Will the inquiry’s terms of reference permit an answer to how far inaction by agencies was influenced by fear of disturbing race or community relations?
Minister reply
The adequacy of Prevent response will be reviewed, focusing on getting families answers about what went wrong.
Ben Obese-Jecty
Con
Huntingdon
Question
On what dates were the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary made aware that Axel Rudakubana was in possession of ricin and an al-Qaeda training manual, and will the inquiry cover public communications after the murders?
Minister reply
Ministers were updated throughout. The Home Office learned about ricin in August and the document later in October. We also briefed the official Opposition. Ultimately, operational decisions are for the police and CPS.
Yvette Cooper
Lab
Home Secretary
Question
In her statement, the Home Secretary said, “Let there be no doubt: responsibility for this outrage lies squarely with the perpetrator.” That is indubitably true, but I would argue that there is blood on the hands of the myriad very difficult to understand Government agencies and quangos that charge around in ever decreasing circles, blaming everybody else when something goes wrong. Will she commit to reviewing every single dropped or downgraded case on which Prevent failed to act appropriately?
Minister reply
We have announced two important things today: an inquiry into what went wrong with this dangerous perpetrator and a new independent commissioner for Prevent reviews. This is crucial as strong enough action was not taken in the past.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
I thank the Home Secretary very much for her statement, her tone and her well-chosen words. I think every one of us in the Chamber is heartbroken for the families and their loss. The trust of local communities was damaged by the information that was released, and I believe a lesson about transparency must be learned. Can the Home Secretary outline how the Government will ensure that trust is rebuilt in the system?
Minister reply
To rebuild trust, we need to get to the truth about what happened: why a dangerous man could commit such an act and ensure strong action going forward.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.