← Back to House of Commons Debates
State of Climate and Nature 2025-07-14
14 July 2025
Lead MP
The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
TaxationClimate
Other Contributors: 38
At a Glance
The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero raised concerns about state of climate and nature 2025-07-14 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Today, the Environment Secretary and I want to share with the British people what we know about the scale of the climate and nature crisis and explain the actions that we are taking in response. The past decade has seen the 10 warmest years globally, with long-term global warming estimated at between 1.34°C and 1.41°C above pre-industrial levels, making last year the first time a single year exceeded 1.5°C. The UK's climate is getting hotter and wetter, with more extreme events. Over the past 50 years, days over 28°C have doubled, and those over 30°C have trebled. Sea levels around the UK rose by 13.4 cm over the last three decades. Globally, species are being lost at an unprecedented rate, with a quarter of British mammals and nearly half of bird species under threat of extinction. The abundance of species in England has fallen by one-third since 1970. Extreme weather impacts include heavy rainfall affecting harvests and more than 6 million properties at risk of flooding. Climate change threatens to cut GDP by 8% by the early 2070s, based on current GDP figures. Britain must act to protect our way of life from these threats. We can do this through reducing emissions, protecting nature, and adapting to impacts. The UK has a history of leadership in climate action, such as the Climate Change Act (2008), net-zero by 2050 legislation (2019), and halting species decline by 2030. At COP26, the UK announced a 1.5°C-aligned target for 2035, based on previous Conservative Government legislation. We are driving forward with ambitious climate targets, clean energy investment, and nature protection measures like the £7.9 billion flood defence programme over the next decade.
Andrew Bowie
Con
West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Question
The Secretary of State declined to defend his plan for clean power by 2030 or the report from the National Energy System Operator. He asks why they are being given a longer statement than usual.
Carla Denyer
Green
Bristol Central
Question
Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Minister reply
Members do not give way when making or responding to a statement.
Bill Esterson
Lab
Sefton Central
Question
Does the Secretary of State agree that the patriotic approach is to work together to cut emissions for financial, security, nature and climate reasons?
Minister reply
The shadow Minister missed something because he needs to acknowledge not just the costs of taking action but the costs of not doing so. The Secretary of State read out those costs: £200 billion or 8% of GDP if we get 3° of warming, according to the OBR.
Roz Savage
LD
South Cotswolds
Question
I thank both the Energy Secretary and the Environment Secretary for today’s momentous statement.
Polly Billington
Lab
East Thanet
Question
Welcomes the statement, particularly the emphasis on linking climate change and nature loss. Questions whether there will be a properly integrated spatial energy plan to protect valuable habitats like saltmarsh.
Minister reply
Acknowledges the importance of habitat protection and confirms ongoing consultation for an integrated land use framework.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
Asks how many major greenhouse gas emitters have adopted similar legislation to the UK's Climate and Nature Bill.
Minister reply
Responds that India, China, and Brazil are taking steps towards renewable energy targets but emphasises that more is needed.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
Question
Expresses despair over the declining consensus on climate action and highlights China's investment in clean technologies.
Minister reply
Appeals for cross-party commitment to legislative targets for certainty in investment.
Seamus Logan
SNP
Aberdeenshire North
Question
Challenges the Secretary of State on reneging on Labour's promise of £28 billion in green transition funding.
Minister reply
Defends Government actions, citing projects like Acorn carbon capture and public energy initiatives.
Luke Murphy
Lab
Basingstoke
Question
Welcomes the statement as a measure that underscores commitment to clean energy despite the loss of cross-party consensus.
Minister reply
Agrees on the need for action over denial, stressing the importance of climate science and urgency.
Harriet Cross
Con
Gordon
Question
Argues that reliance on imported gas is necessary due to ongoing energy demands and global emissions patterns.
Minister reply
Insists on reducing dependence on imported gas through investment in clean energy infrastructure.
Melanie Onn
Lab
Great Grimsby
Question
Expresses concern over job losses at Prax Lindsey oil refinery and seeks reassurance that this is not a result of moving towards clean energy.
Minister reply
Reassures the constituents, attributing job losses to company mismanagement rather than a transition to clean energy.
Tim Farron
LD
Westmorland and Lonsdale
Question
The hon. Gentleman raised concerns about the impact of climate change on farmers, mentioning extreme weather conditions and the need for a food security strategy. He questioned how the Secretary of State would help farmers be resilient against droughts and floods.
Minister reply
The Secretary responded that he acknowledges the importance of addressing threats to farmers' livelihoods from the climate crisis and underlined the necessity of food security, which his right hon. Friend the Environment Secretary takes very seriously.
Barry Gardiner
Lab
Brent West
Question
The Minister was asked about potential restrictions on City of London finance to prevent it from bankrolling deforestation and unsustainable practices linked to cattle ranching and soy production.
Minister reply
The Secretary stated that they are consulting on a mandatory transition plan for large companies and financial institutions, including those in the City of London, to ensure investment goes towards sustainable projects.
Adrian Ramsay
Green
Waveney Valley
Question
The Member asked whether the Secretary of State would support a sixth Government mission focused on protecting the British public from climate change impacts.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband confirmed that tackling net zero is part of their mission and highlighted the need to address current rather than future potential impacts.
Ruth Cadbury
Lab
Brentford and Isleworth
Question
The hon. Member inquired about steps being taken to prioritise grid connections for projects essential to decarbonising transport, including electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband noted that the reordering of the queue is designed to open it up to such projects and mentioned roundtables with the Department for Transport on this matter.
Esther McVey
Con
Tatton
Question
The Secretary was asked directly about the cost in cash terms of achieving net zero, who would pay these costs, and how much the UK’s effort would reduce global temperatures.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband directed the right hon. Member to look at the Climate Change Committee report for details, emphasising that the cost of action is lower than previously thought.
Henry Tufnell
Lab
Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Question
The hon. Gentleman asked if there was a commitment to a just transition that protects jobs and prevents decarbonisation through de-industrialisation.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband affirmed his commitment to protecting existing industries and workers, mentioning various levers such as Great British Energy and the clean industries bonus.
Calum Miller
LD
Bicester and Woodstock
Question
The hon. Member questioned the share of flood defence budget allocated for surface flooding versus river flooding and asked about responsibilities between national/local government, developers, water companies, insurers, and householders.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband offered to have his right hon. Friend write back with a detailed answer.
Sarah Owen
Lab
Luton North
Question
The Member thanked the Secretary of State for tackling climate and nature crises together, inquiring about support available for religious buildings wanting to install solar panels.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband expressed enthusiasm about expanding the scheme beyond schools and hospitals.
Bernard Jenkin
Con
Harwich and North Essex
Question
The hon. Gentleman cited a report suggesting that achieving net zero could cost 21% of GDP, questioning whether this was balanced against risks.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband countered with evidence from the Office for Budget Responsibility, stating that inaction would be far more costly, adding 56% to GDP debt by 2070.
Joe Morris
Lab
Hexham
Question
The hon. Gentleman asked the Secretary of State to recognise important work being done by community groups in his constituency on climate action.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband recognised and thanked the role of local groups such as Humshaugh Net Zero, expressing willingness to continue working with him.
Tulip Siddiq
Lab
Hampstead and Highgate
Question
The Member inquired about leadership at COP30 to tackle climate misinformation and ensure collective action among international partners.
Minister reply
Ed Miliband responded affirmatively, underscoring the importance of addressing misinformation and collaborating internationally.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Question
As a sponsor of the Climate and Nature Bill, I welcome the Secretary of State’s statement this afternoon. He is right to highlight that this is a national crisis, and many of us across the House are right to point out that it cannot be ignored and that inaction has too great a cost, but he will be aware that the costs are politicising this issue for many people in this country. Legislation is before the House regarding where and how pension funds are invested. Can he assure the House that he is talking to Treasury and local government Ministers to ensure that the maximum amount from those pension funds—particularly, but not exclusively, the local government pension fund—can be invested in green energy projects? That will widen the investment base and therefore hopefully reduce costs, depoliticising the issue and resulting in the greening of our energy generation that we all want to see.
Minister reply
I warmly thank the hon. Gentleman for his contribution and his sponsorship of the Climate and Nature Bill. He is the voice of good sense—I hope that is not the kiss of death—on the Conservative Benches. He raises an important issue about pensions and pension investments, and it is one that I will take up.
Jacob Collier
Lab
Burton and Uttoxeter
Question
I welcome the Secretary of State’s statement and the fact that my local hospital will have solar panels on it thanks to this Labour Government, saving thousands of pounds that can go directly back into frontline services. What more can he do to ensure that public buildings like hospitals and prisons have solar panels fitted so that we can lower costs and contribute to our climate goals?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is completely right, and it is a scheme that we want to expand. It has been incredibly successful, and it is a no-brainer—using the natural resources of the sun to cut energy bills and release money for frontline services.
Lee Anderson
Reform
Ashfield
Question
The statement from the Energy Secretary sounded like a desperate attempt to cover up his failure, but he will be aware that businesses are struggling with power bills that are bankrupting them and consumers are resisting the net zero demands to fly less, eat less meat and buy cars that they do not want. Does he not see a connection between what he says about young people’s anxiety and his disgraceful scare tactics today, all of which are to enable him to say that Britain is taking the lead? Since the Paris agreement, emissions have gone up by 30%, so he might be leading, but he does not have too many followers.
Minister reply
The right hon. Gentleman and I have been arguing about these issues for about 20 years, so I think that I am unlikely to persuade him. We usually have good-natured discussions about this, but on the idea that this is scaremongering, we can see with our own eyes what is happening.
Alex Sobel
Lab/Co-op
Leeds Central and Headingley
Question
The Secretary of State has been a global leader in this space for 20 years. We all know about the Climate Change Act 2008, but without his singular intervention at COP15 in Copenhagen, the world would not have agreed and would be on a worse climate trajectory today—the whole House needs to hear that. We now need significant afforestation and the repair of the world’s ecosystems—be they peat bogs, permafrost or seagrass—so what plans does he have to lead in that space at COP30 in Belém?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is very kind. To be frank with him, when I met a group of young people earlier today, I felt a sense of responsibility, because no country is yet doing enough on these issues and we need to do more. They are fearful about the world that they will inherit and look to the Government to show leadership.
Mid Sussex
Question
Hosepipe bans rightly anger my constituents. The bans frustrate them and me because they speak to decades of failure to put in place provisions to prepare so that the changing climate is liveable for our children. How can people be expected to support large-scale house building, which those same children will need, when water companies fail to fix leaks, pollute our rivers and too often fail even to provide clean drinking water?
Minister reply
The hon. Lady raises an important issue. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has commissioned a review of the whole system of regulation of the water companies. I think I am right in saying that a new reservoir has not been built in Britain for 30 years, but we have plans for nine new reservoirs as part of our action to address the issue the hon. Lady raises.
Hitchin
Question
I had the real pleasure of visiting York Road nursery school in my constituency this morning to celebrate its securing Eco-Schools green flag status—with distinction no less. As well as being a sobering reminder of my inability to hold the attention of four-year-olds for very long, it was a powerful reminder that future generations will bear the brunt of our failure to take this crisis seriously. The truth is that we do not have to look to the future to see the cost—my local farmers are beset by flooding, for example. We in Hitchin are already feeling the pain of the failure to take climate change and the nature crisis seriously and to tackle them head-on. What assurances can the Secretary of State give my constituents that we will not shy away from tackling climate change at source, and that we will invest in mitigation schemes to tackle the issues that we are already facing right across our towns and villages?
Minister reply
I congratulate my hon. Friend’s school on what it is doing and on its green flag status, which is really important. It shows that local action can really make a difference. Globally, I can give him the assurance that he seeks.
Llinos Medi
PC
Ynys Môn
Question
Diolch, Madam Ddirprwy Lefarydd. Climate change is a huge threat to food security. In 2018, losses in the Welsh livestock sector due to extreme weather reached £175 million, which is equivalent to 9% of the total Welsh agricultural output. Farmers need support to protect their livestock and crops. Will the Secretary of State listen to the concerns of the farming unions about the removal of the ringfence for Welsh agricultural funding? It could mean less money for climate adaptations, at a time when they are most needed to safeguard food security.
Minister reply
The hon. Lady raises an issue that I believe is essentially about devolved funding, but the wider issue she raises about the costs facing farmers is so important. We are not talking about theoretical events or theoretical future costs; they are happening now.
Sarah Dyke
LD
Glastonbury and Somerton
Question
The Met Office report and the Climate Change Committee have made it clear that we are unprepared for climate change, with progress on food security and nature restoration either insufficient or limited. The Lang partnership in Curry Rivel has proudly championed regenerative farming and nature-friendly farming methods for more than 30 years. What discussions has the Secretary of State had with his colleagues in DEFRA to ensure that farmers like the Langs can farm productively and sustainably and be resilient to climate crisis?
Minister reply
I congratulate the hon. Lady’s constituents on what they are doing to find regenerative ways of farming. My right hon. Friend the Environment Secretary takes the matter incredibly seriously, and we have structures in place that can help to incentivise that.
Rachael Maskell
Lab/Co-op
York Central
Question
I thank my right hon. Friend for making such a pertinent statement when the planet is in such a critical condition. The BioYorkshire project will create 4,000 jobs, helping us to see a green transition but also ensuring that we have future agriculture at the highest level of science. Will my right hon. Friend ensure that this Government, unlike the last, fund that sufficiently so that we can see a real transition in farming and in other areas of climate-mitigating science?
Minister reply
I congratulate my hon. Friend on raising what sounds like an incredibly exciting project.
Shaun Davies
Lab
Telford
Question
Switching to renewables is a top topic among employers; it will help to reduce the cost of their energy supply. Renewables companies tell me about the fantastic, well-paid jobs that are available. Climate security, environment security and energy security are national security. Does my right hon. Friend know a single reason why this is not a key mission to rebuild Britain and protect our planet for generations to come?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is right, and the emphasis that he places on national security is important.
Deirdre Costigan
Lab
Ealing Southall
Question
As the Secretary of State outlined, the climate crisis is also a nature crisis, especially in nature-depleted cities such as London. In recognition of that, Ealing’s Labour council has imaginative plans for a new regional park from Horsenden hill in the north, to Warren farm in my constituency, creating new habitats, wetlands, and rewilded areas. Does the Secretary of State agree that this Government’s new nature recovery fund could help to support initiatives such as Ealing’s regional park, and that in contrast to the piecemeal approach of the previous Government, the fund will allow a more cohesive approach?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend was a fantastic champion of these issues in her previous incarnation.
John Slinger
Lab
Rugby
Question
Rugby borough council and Warwickshire Wildlife Trust are hosting a “Nature in Focus” event this Sunday, and partnering together to buy trees for farmers to plant. In December 2024, my right hon. Friend joined me to visit the Urban&Civic-led Houlton development, where we saw Francis Jackson Homes fitting air-source heat pumps to its new build homes. We talked of our hope to go further, so does my right hon. Friend agree that through the future homes standard, which ensures that the vast majority of new builds will have solar panels, we are showing that a Labour Government and Labour-led councils believe in the concept of government and taking responsibility?
Minister reply
I wish my hon. Friend luck with the event on Sunday.
Tracy Gilbert
Lab
Edinburgh North and Leith
Question
Today’s Met Office report says that we need to put in place a highly localised network of rain gauges, as extreme rainfall can be very dangerous. In July 2021, Stockbridge in my constituency faced flooding after a torrential downpour one afternoon, following several days of soaring temperatures. A network of rain gauges will help to analyse the impact of climate change and also help communities such as Stockbridge to prepare. Will my right hon. Friend outline the Government’s plans in that regard?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend draws attention to what sounds like an important recommendation.
Chris Murray
Lab
Edinburgh East and Musselburgh
Question
I welcome this Government’s focus on the urgency of the climate crisis, and I know that many climate activists in my constituency will as well, because the evidence is unequivocal: only sustained reductions in greenhouse gases will slow global warming. The UK has a special responsibility to show global leadership in this area.
Minister reply
My hon. Friend puts it incredibly well.
Jim Dickson
Lab
Dartford
Question
I warmly welcome the Secretary of State’s statement, particularly his encouragement for Members from across the House to support the Government’s efforts—and those of any future Government who maintain that commitment—to reach net zero by 2050. Does the Secretary of State agree that the announcement by the newly elected Reform county council in Kent that it will axe all investment in net zero is not only a betrayal of my constituents in Dartford and residents across Kent, but particularly of young people, who deserve to inherit a sustainable planet?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right.
Chris Vince
Lab/Co-op
Harlow
Question
When I visit schools in my constituency of Harlow, including the wonderful Freshwaters primary academy, and the Downs primary school, where one young child asked me about the declining number of blackbirds, the No. 1 issue that students raise is climate change. What would the Secretary of State say to young people in Harlow about the action he has taken to protect my constituents, who will face the cost of inaction?
Minister reply
I thank my hon. Friend for his kind words; I am not quite sure how to deal with them—it is a tough one.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.